Відео

With the B787 production rate of 5 aircraft per month, it doesn't take a genius to figure out why the A330 NEO is a good alternative. It actually is available.

Yes, I think that the Airbus A330neo still have a shot at being a popular widebody aircraft in the next decade because I loved its 2-4-2 configuration in Economy Class, which is more enjoyable for pairs than the 3-3-3 layout on the Airbus A350-900 XWB and Boeing 787 Dreamliner, which is more enjoyable only for a group of three or more, and also its common type rating with other Airbus aircrafts, which allows pilots to switch between aircrafts with only a few days of training.

There is

I like the A330neo. airbus can easily deliver these jets on time as they have a less amount of back log to deal with than boeing. they need to get their acts together and sort out all the issues they have before they deliver more aircraft. there are some airbus incidents but not as many as boeing has. airbus could easily over take deliveries in time, as airlines are looking to upgrade their fleets soon.lets see what happens? also the A330 is a fabulous aircraft even if it doesnt get as many orders as the 787 does.

Qantas only got the A330ceo because they were considering ordering the A380 (then the A3XX) and were an all Boeing airline with 767s and 747s for their long haul flights. Airbus offered A330s at large discounts (with some units for free) in order to lock in an order for the A380 while giving the airline some experience with Airbus aircraft before the 380 arrived.

With all the hassle with 787 deliveries I wouldn't be surprised if some airlines start looking at the 330. They can only wait for so long for new aircraft.

A.I.R.B.U.S Airplanes Intentionally Ruining Boeings Unsurpassed Superiority

at least the a330neo won't crash or fall apart mid air. It still is embarassing to see the a330-800neo being the worst selling aircraft though.

As an indian i wish we see more a330's in our airports

As a Filipino, Philippine Airlines did not yet talk about the A330neo, as a matter fact, Filipino Aviation Enthusiast Blogger Mond Ortiz said on Facebook Page: PAL was planning to purchase of Boeing 787 dreamliner including Boeing 787-10. In fact, some Filipino passengers and planespotters was a good choice of Boeing 787-10 dreamliner for the Middle flights to Middle East, Pacific to Honolulu and Australia after the successfully purchasing ordered of Boeing aircraft such as Boeing 747-200 way back in 1970's then Boeing 747-400 since 1990's and Boeing 777-300 ER since 2009. And yes it is a legitimate planning of former PAL President Ramon S. Ang was planning to purchase of Boeing 787 in the future for the additional fleet. As a matter of fact Filipino Enthusiast was surveyed through comments on what aircraft to choose purchasing for the medium flights, and surveyed: 100% Boeing 787 including 787-10 in the future compared to A330neo because they have A330neo for Cebu Pacific

If the doors stay on its good

I like A330

yes

Sri Lankan Airline was the first Air Line who invented A340-300 in Asian region in 1992 But it has not mentioned in this.

A350 Wings is excellent

My favorite one has to go with the A319neo because China Southern Airlines had 4 of these and Tibet Airlines had 6 of these. Also the A319neo is a shortened A320neo

I lived in Alaska for thirty years and flew Alaska Airlines 727 as a passenger for many years to many different destinations. Great memories. Great plane.

Grew up in the back of 727s - flying to Florida and back. Last flight on one was Navy Separation in '89 - the flight back from MGU, saw the green flash as we descended into Norfolk. We smoked in the back of these birds. A lot. 727 is such an iconic looking bird that George Lucas took design elements from it to create Luke's Land Speeder. It is the fastest looking subsonic airliner - even standing still.

If you're a smaller country with no reason to have greater security concerns and your leader is not taking part in all that many global agenda and has less trips abroad, and you're a democracy based on free market and efficiency, a rented aircraft might be the most reasonable option. It can save tax payers loads of money to own and keep an aircraft. Now, regarding countries that are within the central decision makers, you ought to have a dedicated vip transport. I find the situation of SIngapore, for ex. very modern. To me is like a country where the politicians take the bus to work. It shows things are working and representatives are close to the people. But there are some geopolitical protagonists where this is just unfeasable. And here are, of course, those small countries that have a huge luxury vip aircraft just to attend to the will of narcissist leaders.

I flew with a PanAm 727 from Stuttgart to Berlin in Germany. My first flight ever.

Would like to try the longest flight, but in Business class...... I dont know if a tall Swedish man like me, can sit in economy that long.....

✈️

I like this!

I’m sure in 2024 everyone will say Airbus

So e195 can land in runways of 1,600 meters?

The 777 is my childhood aircraft, absolutely adore it. Been flying the Saudia -200ER it on high volume domestic flights in Saudi & also to London. I was so happy when saudia received its first -300ER, fast forward to 2018 and the kind pilots allowed me to visit its cockpit after a flight from heathrow to jeddah! Today I fly the PMDG 777 on my simulator and one day I hope I will fly a real one

Like Boeing its another example of low intelligence and cultural failure in corporate executive selection of senior staff. Start recruiting European executives to smash this America specific failure.

The new 321 will prove NOT adequate for XLR sectors out of hot and high airports, short or contaminated runways.. The solutions for the RCT safety will penalize range and/or payload. For what it promises, it would have required a larger wing, bigger flaps, and an 8-wheeled MLG, something more similar to the 757. Furthermore the problems with the P&W geared engines makes ETOPS clearances doubtful. A postponement of the type certification till 2025 or later looks realistic.

So it went from Medium to Small to Large then back to Small then XLR Medium then now back to Small?

You guys and the ridiculous arrows on the thumbnail pictures for these videos….give it up already, because it looks hyped and stupid.

not only that but for some reason apps don’t even offer you connecting flight from europe to hawaii. at least not from my country Croatia. had to buy separate tickets to LA and then from LA to Honolulu

PAL?

Cabotage rules I suspect and the flight times

Wow a butter machine lore

Ngl, it’s pretty impressive how Airbus pivoted from the A380 (commercial) failure based on H&S to the A321XLR based on P2P. Boeing primarily made the 747-8 to force Airbus to go all in on the A380 while they focus on the 787 for better P2P service.

I won't fly anything, but Jetblue. Best airline ever. Never late and friendly employees.

Who is this crow that keeps on flying?

First time I ever flew, as a teenager in 1997, was on a United 727. I was enthralled by the takeoff and the view through the window.

I know it's probably extremely doubtful but I'd love to see it work

Still looks like 5H-TCJ remains in Kuala Lumpur. Bummer

Iberia, plenty of times with the 727

Now I know and I will not fly on any Ethiopian airlines if it’s Boeing. Good thing when you purchase your ticket you know what airplane you’re flying on.

It's not so much the lack of business travellers as that it is also the case for many long-haul vacation destinations you can reach non-stop from Europe. Phuket/Thailand, the Maldives, Mauritius or the Carribean islands are all within the 10-12 hour flight time bracket. So Hawaii would also compete on many more items than just flight hours with those established destinations. One could be the costs of accomodation, rental cars, dining etc. in Hawaii - compared for example to Thailand. The Maldives are not exactly cheap but score high on being exclusive and remote. And so on.

Airbus junk as usual.

I'm happy to see this channel cover the A-10, but it's also very easy to see that they're a bit out of their league. Turning radius is not something you want, for example. However, I'm glad to see this channel venture out, and i hope to see more of this channel, albeit better checked.

I've flown on them several times. Still a relevant aircraft.

Worst airline CEO. Robert Isom or Bob Jordan? Both need to be fired. It's a race between AA and WN to the bottom of the garbage can. Right now Southwest is winning the race to the bottom but you never know from AA.

The chances of a European carrier ever flying non stop to Hawaii is about the same chance as Emmanuel Macron dating Donald Trump.

More and more the A220-500 is in talk! Interesting! I hope they will go that way, that will kill the Boeing 737 Series!

For security reason, I prefer the Airbus A-220 at 100%.